I legitimately cannot write about this. So many thoughts and
yet no thoughts at all come to mind. I hate sexism and this sense of aggression
that exists on both sides. I’ve historically cried thinking about the
disparities that exist between the genders, and really humans in many manners. Both
articles suggest being moderate without saying so, but in the same time both
are just too aggressive to be doing anything right. When facts are thrown out
of the window, opinionated rhetoric comes in. In The War on Men there is
an obvious use of “facts” trying to illustrate an opinion like the marriage
polls or especially the “They want to provide for and protect their family – it’s
in their DNA” quote. In reality this is all just a play on opinion. To me that
doesn’t need to determine anything. In the same way Michael drops the “I
thought of how painful it is when you are used to having everything to now have
only 80%” with no real evidence behind it and no insight into what those men in
the 80% or 20% think. The goal of these articles, whether they know it or not,
is not to bring progress but rather just to stir things up on their side. At this
point the only way things are going to be made so that everyone involved is
happy is through softness, kindness, and mutual understanding. Often in sexism
this doesn’t exist. Whether it is the feminists’ side that is too often somewhat
brash, intimidating, and arrogantly intelligent or the anti-feminists’ side
that is too often stupid, harsh, and misleading, there doesn’t seem to be room
for understanding, cooperation, kindness, communication, or anything of the
sort. Then again, I regard this idea/rule to be the reason any of the world’s changeable
problems actually exist. And that’s exactly it. That’s all there is to say. I
won’t voice my opinion and reaction simply because I wouldn’t know where to
start. I wish I could write more, but I feel as if I couldn’t if I tried. There’s
not even a point putting more than one quote per piece, even though I believe
in doing more than the minimum, because even that would yield nothing more I
could say without saying my own opinion.
I think this was a good analysis-- I think you articulated well.
ReplyDeleteYou did a good job and made some valid points. I agree that not matter how biased the speaker says he is he has a side and a point to make.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in that it is hard to write about this subject because it is frustrating. However I don't agree with your perception that the articles were aggressive. I didn't pick up any aggressive tone in the articles. I like how you brought up that one of the articles uses facts. Facts can been presented in any way and can be distorted. I like how you noticed that she turned the fact into her own opinion.
ReplyDeleteI just really like the post. You did a good job at everything in the post.
ReplyDelete